THE ORIGIN OF THE AYTIS: A HISTORICAL-TYPOLOGICAL PATH FROM WORLD FOLKLORE THROUGH THE TURKIC PEOPLES TO THE KARAKALPAK TRADITION

Authors

  • Aybek Jamalov Assistant Lecturer, Department of Folk Creativity, Uzbekistan State Institute of Arts and Culture, Nukus Branch

Keywords:

aytıs, verbal contest, munazara (debate poem), ozan, ashıq

Abstract

The article examines the origin of the aytıs genre (a poetic contest between two
performers) in a consistent sequence, from the verbal-contest traditions of world folklore, through
the Turkic peoples, to Karakalpak aytıs. First, examples of verbal contests from Mesopotamian,
ancient Greek and Italian traditions are presented as a typological background. Then the earliest
Turkic written debate poem (Mahmud al-Kashgari), the ozan tradition and the ashıq atıshma of
Anatolia, and Azerbaijani and Kazakh-Kyrgyz aytıs are compared. On Central Asian material, the
transition of badik, zhar-zhar and qaym-aytıs from ritual roots to verbal contest is traced. In the
Karakalpak part, ritual songs collected by Q. Ayımbetov (bádik-gúlapsan, porxan zikiri, yaramazan,
xawjar, bet ashar), sheshenlik (the art of the orator), juwap (the girl-boy reply contest), contest
elements in epics and the aytıs of poets are analysed in the Turkic context. As a result, a staged
model of the formation of aytıs is proposed as a scientific hypothesis, and its confirmed and
unconfirmed parts are separated.

References

1. Aitysh/Aitys, art of improvisation (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan) // UNESCO. Representative List of

the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. – 2015. – URL:

https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/00997 (accessed: 08.10.2026).

2. Ayımbetov Q. Qaraqalpaq folklorı [Karakalpak Folklore]. – Nókis: «Qaraqalpaqstan», 1977. – pp.

26–45, 118–135. (In Karakalpak, Cyrillic script).

3. Mittermayer C. Was sprach der eine zum anderen? Argumentationsformen in den sumerischen

Rangstreitgesprächen. – Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2019. – (Untersuchungen zur Assyriologie

und vorderasiatischen Archäologie, 15). – DOI: 10.1515/9783110634327. – Only the

catalogue abstract was read.

4. Jarring G. Some Notes on Eastern Turki (New Uighur) Munazara Literature. – Lund: CWK

Gleerup, 1981. – (Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis, 1980-

1981:2). – URL: https://archive.org/details/dli.pahar.3564 (accessed: 08.10.2026).

5. Lelantine War, Eretria and Chalkis, and the Contest of Homer and Hesiod // Classical Inquiries,

Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard University. – URL: https://classicalinquiries.

chs.harvard.edu/lelantine-war-eretria-and-chalkis-and-the-contest-of-homer-andhesiod/

(accessed: 08.10.2026). – Author and year are not given in the source.

6. Pagliai V. Conflict, cooperation, and facework in contrasto verbal duels // Journal of Linguistic

Anthropology. – 2010. – Vol. 20, No. 1. – P. 87–100. – Only the catalogue entry was

consulted.

7. Poyraz Y. Âşık Tarzı Türk Şiirinde Divan Şiiri Hayal ve Mazmunlarının Kullanılması //

Folklor/Edebiyat. – 2014. – Cilt 20, Sayı 80. – S. 245–273.

8. Âşıklık (minstrelsy) tradition (Türkiye) // UNESCO. Representative List of the Intangible

Cultural Heritage of Humanity. – 2009. – URL: https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/00179 (accessed:

08.10.2026).

9. Artun E. Çukurova Âşıklık Geleneğinde Atışma // Folklor/Edebiyat. – 2013. – Cilt 19, Sayı 75. –

S. 73–116.

10. Kozhabekova Zh., Pangereyev A. XIX–XX ǵasırlardaǵı qazaq aytıslarındaǵı ulttıq ıdeya [The

national idea in Kazakh aitys of the 19th–20th centuries] (in Kazakh) // Yasawi universitetiniń

xabarshısı. – 2023. – № 4 (130). – pp. 126–138. – DOI: 10.47526/2023-4/2664-0686.11.

11. Aytys // Wikipedia (mirror of the March 2026 version). – URL:

https://wiki.krisyotam.com/content/wikipedia_en_all_nopic_2026-03/Aitys (accessed:

08.10.2026). – Secondary encyclopaedic source.

12. Tleuberdina G., Mukasheva A., Zhakupova A., Anichshenko O., Baimanova L. Typology and

poetics of modern aitys // Universidad de Jaén electronic journal. – 2026. – URL:

https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/blo/article/view/9851 (accessed: 08.10.2026).

13. Satinbekova M. Sözlü Şiirden Aytısa: Kazak Folklorundaki Bädik Şiirlerinin Türsel Değişimi //

Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi. – 2022. – Cilt 15, Sayı 38. – S. 458–468. – Only the

abstract was read.

14. Kazakhstan Marks 190 Years of Birzhan-sal, Aitys Artist Who Defied Patriarchy // The Astana

Times. – 2024. – URL: https://astanatimes.com/2024/08/kazakhstan-marks-190-years-ofbirzhan-

sal-aitys-artist-who-defied-patriarchy/ (accessed: 08.10.2026).

15. Eshonqulov J. «Folklor ijrochilik san’ati tarixi» fanidan ma’ruzalar matni [Lecture text for the

course "History of the Art of Folklore Performance"]. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston davlat san’at

va madaniyat instituti, 2018. (In Uzbek).

16. Jarimbetov Q., Orazımbetov Q. Qaraqalpaq ádebiyatı [Karakalpak Literature] (textbook for

vocational colleges, for non-Karakalpak audiences). – Nókis: «Bilim», 2010. – p. 87 and the

section on the epic "Garip-ashıq".

17. Paxratdinov Yu. «Qaraqalpaq folklorı» [Karakalpak Folklore]. Lecture text. Berdaq Karakalpak

State University, Department of Karakalpak Literature. – Nókis, 2007.

18. Bazarbaeva B. Qaraqalpaq juwap aytıslarınıń janrlıq hám kórkemlik ózgeshelikleri [Genre and

artistic features of Karakalpak juwap aytıs] // Ilim hám jámiyet. – 2022. – № 4-1. – pp. 113–

115. – URL: https://journal.ndpi.uz/ss/article/view/2038 (accessed: 08.10.2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13