DYSMENORRHEA: CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS, PATHOGENESIS AND CONTEMPORARY TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Authors

  • Zarina Tillayeva Termez University of Economics and Service
  • Islom Mamadiyorov Termez University of Economics and Service
  • Davronbek Xojiboyev Termez University of Economics and Service

Keywords:

dysmenorrhea, primary dysmenorrhea, secondary dysmenorrhea, prostaglandins, NSAIDs

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea is one of the most frequent gynecological complaints among adolescents and
women of reproductive age. It is often normalized as a routine part of menstruation, yet recurrent
menstrual pain may substantially reduce educational participation, work productivity, sleep quality,
mental well-being, and social functioning. This article provides an IMRAD-based analytical review
of dysmenorrhea with emphasis on clinical phenotypes, prostaglandin-centered pathogenesis,
differential diagnosis, contemporary treatment strategies, real-world evidence, artificial intelligence,
pharmacovigilance, and implementation perspectives for Uzbekistan.
Evidence was synthesized from PubMed-indexed reviews, Cochrane evidence, WHO
menstrual health materials, ACOG and ESHRE guidance, and regulatory sources from FDA and
EMA on real-world evidence and AI-enabled health technologies. The review highlights that
primary dysmenorrhea is mainly driven by increased endometrial production of prostaglandin F2α
and prostaglandin E2, which induce myometrial hypercontractility, vasoconstriction, ischemia, and
pain. Secondary dysmenorrhea requires active evaluation for endometriosis, adenomyosis, fibroids,
pelvic inflammatory disease, and structural anomalies. NSAIDs, hormonal therapy, heat therapy,
exercise, patient education, and timely referral form the core of modern management.
The article argues that modern dysmenorrhea care should combine pathophysiological
reasoning with real-world evidence, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacovigilance, and ethically
governed artificial intelligence. Such an approach is especially important for health systems
developing electronic prescriptions, registries, and digital clinical decision support. For Uzbekistan structured menstrual health documentation may create a foundation for safer analgesic use, earlier
detection of secondary dysmenorrhea, and locally relevant research

References

1. World Health Organization. Menstrual health. Geneva: WHO; 2026. Available from:

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/menstrual-health

2. Itani R, Soubra L, Karout S, Rahme D, Karout L, Khojah HMJ. Primary dysmenorrhea:

pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment updates. Korean J Fam Med. 2022;43(2):101-108.

doi:10.4082/kjfm.21.0103

3. Marjoribanks J, Ayeleke RO, Farquhar C, Proctor M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for

dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD001751.

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3

4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 760:

Dysmenorrhea and endometriosis in the adolescent. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):e249-e258.

doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002978

5. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline:

endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac009

6. Gutman G, Nunez AT, Fisher M. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc

Health Care. 2022;52(5):101186. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2022.101186

7. Osayande AS, Mehulic S. Diagnosis and initial management of dysmenorrhea. Am Fam

Physician. 2014;89(5):341-346.

8. Smith RP. Dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. In: Berek JS, editor. Berek & Novak’s Gynecology.

16th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.

9. Dawood MY. Primary dysmenorrhea: advances in pathogenesis and management. Obstet

Gynecol. 2006;108(2):428-441. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000230214.26638.0c

10. Akerlund M. Pathophysiology of dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl.

1979;87:27-32.

11. Pulkkinen MO. Prostaglandins and the non-pregnant uterus: the pathophysiology of primary

dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1983;113:63-67.

doi:10.3109/00016348309155200

12. Zheng Q, Huang G, Cao W, Zhao Y. Comparative effectiveness of exercise interventions for

primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health.

2024;24:610. doi:10.1186/s12905-024-03453-w

13. Tsai IC, Hsu CW, et al. Comparative effectiveness of different exercises for reducing pain

intensity in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of

randomized controlled trials. Sports Med Open. 2024;10:63. doi:10.1186/s40798-024-00718-4

14. Sharma S, Ali K, Narula H. Exercise therapy and electrotherapy as an intervention for primary

dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Lifestyle Med. 2023;13(1):16-26.

doi:10.15280/jlm.2023.13.1.16

15. Heat therapy for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Available from:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12876241/

16. Damm T, Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Ouyang C, Feranec J. Continuous vs. cyclic combined hormonal

contraceptives for treatment of dysmenorrhea: a systematic review. Contracept X.

2019;1:100002. doi:10.1016/j.conx.2019.100002

17. Shi J, Leng J. Effect and safety of drospirenone and ethinylestradiol tablets (II) for

dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:938606.

doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.938606

18. Naz MSG, Kiani Z, Rashidi Fakari F, Ozgoli G. The effect of micronutrients on pain

management of primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Caring Sci.

2020;9(1):47-56. doi:10.34172/jcs.2020.008

19. Harel Z. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young adults: etiology and management. J Pediatr

Adolesc Gynecol. 2006;19(6):363-371. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2006.09.001

20. French L. Dysmenorrhea. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71(2):285-291.

21. Food and Drug Administration. Real-world evidence. Silver Spring: FDA. Available from:

https://www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/real-world-evidence

22. Food and Drug Administration. Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decisionmaking

for medical devices: guidance for industry and FDA staff. Silver Spring: FDA; 2025.

23. European Medicines Agency. Real-world evidence. Amsterdam: EMA; 2026. Available from:

https://www.ema.europa.eu/

24. European Medicines Agency. Data Analysis and Real World Interrogation Network (DARWIN

EU). Amsterdam: EMA; 2026.

25. European Medicines Agency. Guide on real-world evidence provided by EMA: support for

regulatory decision-making. Amsterdam: EMA; 2024.

26. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. Geneva:

WHO; 2021.

27. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: guidance

on large multi-modal models. Geneva: WHO; 2024.

28. Food and Drug Administration. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based

Software as a Medical Device Action Plan. Silver Spring: FDA; 2021.

29. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory

Agency. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles.

2021.

30. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH E9(R1): Addendum on estimands and sensitivity

analysis in clinical trials. Geneva: ICH; 2019.

31. International Council for Harmonisation. Reflection paper on real-world evidence terminology

and convergence of general principles regarding planning and reporting of studies using realworld

data. Geneva: ICH; 2023.

32. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not

available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):758-764. doi:10.1093/aje/kwv254

33. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding

in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424.

doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

34. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc.

1958;53(282):457-481.

35. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1972;34(2):187-220.

36. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The

PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ.

2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

37. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The STROBE

statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457.

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

38. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised

tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898

39. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-140-son qarori. Sog‘liqni saqlash tizimini

raqamlashtirishga doir qo‘shimcha chora-tadbirlar to‘g‘risida. Toshkent; 2023.

40. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Sog‘liqni saqlash vazirligi. Elektron retsept tizimini joriy etish

bo‘yicha axborot. Toshkent; 2025.

41. UzDaily. Uzbekistan launches Electronic Prescription system from 10 December. Tashkent;

2025.

42. Spot. Sog‘liqni saqlash tizimi qanday raqamlashtiriladi? Toshkent; 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-19