DYSMENORRHEA: CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS, PATHOGENESIS AND CONTEMPORARY TREATMENT STRATEGIES
Keywords:
dysmenorrhea, primary dysmenorrhea, secondary dysmenorrhea, prostaglandins, NSAIDsAbstract
Dysmenorrhea is one of the most frequent gynecological complaints among adolescents and
women of reproductive age. It is often normalized as a routine part of menstruation, yet recurrent
menstrual pain may substantially reduce educational participation, work productivity, sleep quality,
mental well-being, and social functioning. This article provides an IMRAD-based analytical review
of dysmenorrhea with emphasis on clinical phenotypes, prostaglandin-centered pathogenesis,
differential diagnosis, contemporary treatment strategies, real-world evidence, artificial intelligence,
pharmacovigilance, and implementation perspectives for Uzbekistan.
Evidence was synthesized from PubMed-indexed reviews, Cochrane evidence, WHO
menstrual health materials, ACOG and ESHRE guidance, and regulatory sources from FDA and
EMA on real-world evidence and AI-enabled health technologies. The review highlights that
primary dysmenorrhea is mainly driven by increased endometrial production of prostaglandin F2α
and prostaglandin E2, which induce myometrial hypercontractility, vasoconstriction, ischemia, and
pain. Secondary dysmenorrhea requires active evaluation for endometriosis, adenomyosis, fibroids,
pelvic inflammatory disease, and structural anomalies. NSAIDs, hormonal therapy, heat therapy,
exercise, patient education, and timely referral form the core of modern management.
The article argues that modern dysmenorrhea care should combine pathophysiological
reasoning with real-world evidence, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacovigilance, and ethically
governed artificial intelligence. Such an approach is especially important for health systems
developing electronic prescriptions, registries, and digital clinical decision support. For Uzbekistan structured menstrual health documentation may create a foundation for safer analgesic use, earlier
detection of secondary dysmenorrhea, and locally relevant research
References
1. World Health Organization. Menstrual health. Geneva: WHO; 2026. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/menstrual-health
2. Itani R, Soubra L, Karout S, Rahme D, Karout L, Khojah HMJ. Primary dysmenorrhea:
pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment updates. Korean J Fam Med. 2022;43(2):101-108.
doi:10.4082/kjfm.21.0103
3. Marjoribanks J, Ayeleke RO, Farquhar C, Proctor M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for
dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD001751.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 760:
Dysmenorrhea and endometriosis in the adolescent. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):e249-e258.
doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002978
5. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline:
endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac009
6. Gutman G, Nunez AT, Fisher M. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc
Health Care. 2022;52(5):101186. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2022.101186
7. Osayande AS, Mehulic S. Diagnosis and initial management of dysmenorrhea. Am Fam
Physician. 2014;89(5):341-346.
8. Smith RP. Dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. In: Berek JS, editor. Berek & Novak’s Gynecology.
16th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
9. Dawood MY. Primary dysmenorrhea: advances in pathogenesis and management. Obstet
Gynecol. 2006;108(2):428-441. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000230214.26638.0c
10. Akerlund M. Pathophysiology of dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl.
1979;87:27-32.
11. Pulkkinen MO. Prostaglandins and the non-pregnant uterus: the pathophysiology of primary
dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1983;113:63-67.
doi:10.3109/00016348309155200
12. Zheng Q, Huang G, Cao W, Zhao Y. Comparative effectiveness of exercise interventions for
primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health.
2024;24:610. doi:10.1186/s12905-024-03453-w
13. Tsai IC, Hsu CW, et al. Comparative effectiveness of different exercises for reducing pain
intensity in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials. Sports Med Open. 2024;10:63. doi:10.1186/s40798-024-00718-4
14. Sharma S, Ali K, Narula H. Exercise therapy and electrotherapy as an intervention for primary
dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Lifestyle Med. 2023;13(1):16-26.
doi:10.15280/jlm.2023.13.1.16
15. Heat therapy for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12876241/
16. Damm T, Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Ouyang C, Feranec J. Continuous vs. cyclic combined hormonal
contraceptives for treatment of dysmenorrhea: a systematic review. Contracept X.
2019;1:100002. doi:10.1016/j.conx.2019.100002
17. Shi J, Leng J. Effect and safety of drospirenone and ethinylestradiol tablets (II) for
dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:938606.
doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.938606
18. Naz MSG, Kiani Z, Rashidi Fakari F, Ozgoli G. The effect of micronutrients on pain
management of primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Caring Sci.
2020;9(1):47-56. doi:10.34172/jcs.2020.008
19. Harel Z. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young adults: etiology and management. J Pediatr
Adolesc Gynecol. 2006;19(6):363-371. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2006.09.001
20. French L. Dysmenorrhea. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71(2):285-291.
21. Food and Drug Administration. Real-world evidence. Silver Spring: FDA. Available from:
https://www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/real-world-evidence
22. Food and Drug Administration. Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decisionmaking
for medical devices: guidance for industry and FDA staff. Silver Spring: FDA; 2025.
23. European Medicines Agency. Real-world evidence. Amsterdam: EMA; 2026. Available from:
24. European Medicines Agency. Data Analysis and Real World Interrogation Network (DARWIN
EU). Amsterdam: EMA; 2026.
25. European Medicines Agency. Guide on real-world evidence provided by EMA: support for
regulatory decision-making. Amsterdam: EMA; 2024.
26. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. Geneva:
WHO; 2021.
27. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: guidance
on large multi-modal models. Geneva: WHO; 2024.
28. Food and Drug Administration. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based
Software as a Medical Device Action Plan. Silver Spring: FDA; 2021.
29. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles.
2021.
30. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH E9(R1): Addendum on estimands and sensitivity
analysis in clinical trials. Geneva: ICH; 2019.
31. International Council for Harmonisation. Reflection paper on real-world evidence terminology
and convergence of general principles regarding planning and reporting of studies using realworld
data. Geneva: ICH; 2023.
32. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not
available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):758-764. doi:10.1093/aje/kwv254
33. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding
in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424.
doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
34. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc.
1958;53(282):457-481.
35. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1972;34(2):187-220.
36. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The
PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ.
2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
37. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The STROBE
statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
38. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised
tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898
39. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-140-son qarori. Sog‘liqni saqlash tizimini
raqamlashtirishga doir qo‘shimcha chora-tadbirlar to‘g‘risida. Toshkent; 2023.
40. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Sog‘liqni saqlash vazirligi. Elektron retsept tizimini joriy etish
bo‘yicha axborot. Toshkent; 2025.
41. UzDaily. Uzbekistan launches Electronic Prescription system from 10 December. Tashkent;
2025.
42. Spot. Sog‘liqni saqlash tizimi qanday raqamlashtiriladi? Toshkent; 2023.