RECITATION OF AL-FATIHA

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of "abrogation" in Islamic jurisprudence, particularly focusing on the notion of adding to the Quran through a single report (ahad hadith) and the implications of such additions. Imam Nasafi and Imam Sarakhsi's opinions on this matter are examined, highlighting their views on why additions through a single report do not establish new rulings but rather lead to abrogation. The article further explores the distinction between "fard" (obligatory) and "wajib" (necessary), as understood by the Hanafi scholars, and how they approach the use of ahad hadith in legal rulings. A key example is provided to clarify the difference between "fard" and "wajib" and the application of ahad hadith in the Hanafi school of thought. The article emphasizes the importance of placing each piece of evidence in its proper context, with the Quran as the primary source and ahad hadith as supplementary.